© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and CURE - Oncology & Cancer News for Patients & Caregivers. All rights reserved.
Burt now has two primary cancers: a renal clear cell carcinoma and an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (spread to the liver). Despite his diagnosis, he is still his old self, but better. He volunteers a ton, is an advocate for patients and integrative oncology and takes pretty good care of himself. He is all about his next adventures and refuses to let cancer get in his way! And most importantly, his sense of humor is better than ever. Burt’s blog can be found at Adventures With Cancer.
During my time with cancer, I've come across words associated with cancer that I don't like and some that I appreciate.
There are lots of words used in cancer. Words to describe patients, conditions, treatments, test results, etc. Words really matter! For the first time (at least that I am aware of!) in my life, I was told that my brain is “unremarkable.” What was my first reaction? “F you! My brain is absolutely remarkable!”
Then I learned, that “unremarkable” in cancer is a good thing. So interesting, isn’t it? Why can’t they just use words like normal, stable, no disease, clear, etc.? I guess medicine has a language of its own. But it takes getting used to.
Unremarkable and stable become the words we hope to hear. When, in normal life, neither of those are great words that we strive for. Another favorite? “Unrelated.” What I have learned is that “unrelated” in medicine really means “we don’t understand how it’s related.” I have two primary cancers — kidney cancer and an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor — and I have been told that they are unrelated. I am a finite vessel. How can they truly be unrelated? I get that the technology and science don’t exist yet to explain how they are related, but come on, they are!
Let’s go to the more controversial topic. Guess what I don't like to call myself? A cancer survivor. To me, a survivor is someone who's gone through something and comes out the other side. While my cancer is treatable, it's pretty much not curable, which technically means I will never be a survivor.
Also, what if someone doesn't survive (or chooses not to)? It almost feels like there's some judgment in there. Most people with cancer will do anything they can to overcome it and live happily and even better lives, whether they are living with it or are "cured." But if you don't survive it (or if you don't want to survive it), are you a failure? I feel like people will question if you did everything you could to survive. "Survivor" can be a loaded term in the community of people who have cancer.
I also don’t like being labeled. I am not the same as everyone else, and as soon as you apply a label to me, I lose my uniqueness. I always opt to focus on the individual as opposed to the group. We are all different and have different sensibilities. We need people to respect each other's individuality.
Here are some other terms I don't like. And then I will get into the ones I do.
I like individualized things and things with personality. So as discussed above, Burt who happens to have cancer is fine. My two new faves, that are generic but at least have attitude are:
These don't imply anything other than the fact that you are playing the hand you were dealt and playing it to the best of your abilities. I guess my parting thought is to think about the individual and ask them how they refer to themselves (and want to be referred to their name is a great place to start instead of a label) and why they choose what they do. We are all unique. We need to remember that.
For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.
Related Content: