Data Support Fixed-Treatment Duration of Imbruvica/Venclexta Combo Could Lead to Treatment Discontinuation in Certain Patients With CLL/SLL

December 5, 2020
Ryan McDonald
Ryan McDonald

Ryan McDonald, Associate Editorial Director for CURE®, has been with the team since February 2020 and has previously covered medical news across several specialties prior to joining MJH Life Sciences. He is a graduate of Temple University, where he studied journalism and minored in political science and history. He considers himself a craft beer snob and would like to open a brewery in the future. During his spare time, he can be found rooting for all major Philadelphia sports teams. Follow Ryan on Twitter @RMcDonald11 or email him at rmcdonald@curetoday.com.

Data suggest that patients with CLL/SLL who achieve confirmed undetectable minimal residual disease following 12 cycles of Imbruvica combined with Venclexta could possibly discontinue and reasonably remain off treatment.

Data from the phase 2 CAPTIVATE trial, presented at the ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, demonstrated that patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who were randomized to receive placebo following a fixed-treatment duration of Imbruvica (ibrutinib) combined with Venclexta (venetoclax) achieved similar one-year disease-free survival (DFS) results compared with patients who remained on Imbruvica following confirmed undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD).

These results, according to lead study investigator Dr. William G. Wierda, suggest that treatment could be discontinued for some of these patients.

“The one-year disease-free survival rate of 95% in patients randomized to placebo is similar to the rate for patients randomized to (Imbruvica), supporting a fixed-duration treatment with 12 cycles of combined ibrutinib plus venetoclax and treatment discontinuation for patients who achieved confirmed undetectable MRD,” said Wierda during a virtual presentation of data from the MRD cohort of the trial.

The aim of this cohort of the CAPTIVATE trial, according to Wierda, was to assess if deep remissions could be achieved following a one-year fixed duration of Imbruvica plus Venclexta, and if patients could discontinue treatment and reasonably remain off treatment.

Measuring one-year DFS, which is the length of time after primary cancer treatment ends that a patient survives without any signs or symptoms of disease, in patients who continued receiving Imbruvica or placebo following a confirmation of undetectable MRD (or small number of cancer cells that remain after treatment) was the main goal of the study.

Patients enrolled on the multicenter, international phase 2 study received three cycles of Imbruvica and then 12 cycles of Imbruvica and Venclexta. Patients were then randomized to receive continued therapy or placebo depending on their MRD status.

Among 149 evaluable patients (median age, 58 years; range, 28-69), 58% achieved confirmed undetectable MRD and were randomized to either continue receiving Imbruvica (43 patients) or placebo (43 patients). The remaining 63 patients who did not reach confirmed undetectable MRD were randomized to continue receiving single-agent Imbruvica (31 patients) or the combination (32 patients).

Data demonstrated that patients who continued to receive Imbruvica following confirmed undetectable MRD tests achieved a one-year DFS of 100% compared with 95.3% in the placebo group.

After a median follow-up of 31.3 months, all evaluable patients achieved a 30-month progression-free survival (PFS) of 95.3%. Each randomized arm in both the confirmed undetectable MRD and unconfirmed undetectable MRD group achieved a 30-month PFS, which is the time during and after treatment a patient lives with the disease, but it does not get worse, of 95% or greater.

In patients who had unconfirmed undetectable MRD following the initial 12 cycles of therapy, continued combination therapy elicited an increase in undetectable MRD compared with those who received Imbruvica alone.

Following additional randomized treatment with Imbruvica, undetectable MRD in participants’ bone marrow increased from 32% to 42% compared with 31% to 66% in patients who continued to receive the combination. Moreover, undetectable MRD in peripheral blood samples remained at 45% for patients who received additional Imbruvica and increased from 50% to 69% in patients who received the combination.

Very few patients in each arm required dose reduction or dose discontinuation as a result of treatment-related adverse events, according to Wierda. No patients within the confirmed undetectable MRD group discontinued treatment as a result of adverse events. There were, however, three treatment discontinuations — two in those who continued to receive the combination and one for Imbruvica — related to adverse events in the group that did not have confirmed undetectable MRD.

The most common serious or severe adverse events of interest over time were neutropenia (a low number of neutrophils, or a type of white blood cell) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Occurrences varied across the treatment arms.

“There were no safety concerns with this highly active combination of first-line ibrutinib and venetoclax, an all-oral, once-daily, fixed-duration regimen that achieves undetectable MRD in blood or bone marrow in three-quarters of patients after 12 cycles of combined treatment,” said Wierda.

When asked by an attendee if this data is practice changing, Wierda acknowledged that this is an initial study and that more research is necessary, but the data are promising for some patients.

“I think we need additional data. And, as you know, I'm sure there are a number of phase 3 trials that are ongoing, looking at various combinations of targeted therapy. This is an initial study … and it clearly shows the efficacy in terms of depth of remission with this combination,” he said. “And also … the one-year disease-free survival rate between those patients who continued ibrutinib single agent versus those who had no further treatment, among the ones who achieved a confirmed undetectable MRD status, was not different. So, I think this supports the concept of fixed duration treatment, particularly for those patients who achieve an undetectable MRD status.”

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here