© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and CURE - Oncology & Cancer News for Patients & Caregivers. All rights reserved.
Brielle Benyon, Assistant Managing Editor for CURE®, has been with MJH Life Sciences since 2016. She has served as an editor on both CURE and its sister publication, Oncology Nursing News. Brielle is a graduate from The College of New Jersey. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time with family and friends, CrossFit and wishing she had the grace and confidence of her toddler-aged daughter.
NextSource Pharma, a small pharmaceutical company based in Florida, acquired the drug lomustine from Bristol-Myers Squibb, changed its brand name to Gleostine, and changed the price – by about 1,400 percent.
For many people, financial toxicity is an unfortunate reality that comes along with a cancer diagnosis. But when the price of a drug gradually skyrockets over the course of a few years, that burden can become even worse.
This was the situation for patients who were being treated with the drug lomustine, an oral chemotherapy agent used to treat Hodgkin lymphoma and glioblastoma, that was marketed as CeeNu by the pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). In 2013, BMS divested in the product as a part of a portfolio prioritization decision, Sarah Koenig, a press contact at the Research and Development department of BMS told CURE in an email.
That same year, NextSource Pharma, a small pharmaceutical company based in Florida, acquired the drug and not only changed its brand name to Gleostine, but also changed the price — by about 1,400 percent.
When owned by BMS, the drug was sold for about $50 per pill. Now, the price is about $750, and has no generic version, nor is it patent-protected.
“One month’s worth of pills, already over $1,500 per month, will now cost over $23,000 per month. Insane prices that have been made more insane by one massively greedy CEO who wants to build his profits on the backs of dying women, men and children who can barely afford the treatment to begin with,” Tracey Gamer-Fanning, co-founder of the Connecticut Brain Tumor Alliance (CTBTA) and grade 3 brain tumor survivor told CURE.
But according to NextSource, there is more to drug pricing than meets the eye.
“The subject of drug pricing is an important one. It is more complex than many realize,” the company said in a press release.
The statement said the price of Gleostine reflects the cost of raw materials, including a key manufacturing component; supplying the product at little to no cost to the government for use in patients with Medicaid or the government drug discount program, where prices are as low as five cents per capsule; increasing FDA and health authority licensing fees; providing the drug at a much lower cost to patients who are uninsured or lack the resources to pay; maintaining a year’s-worth inventory to ensure availability.
“Finally, it is important to note that there are currently less than five FDA-approved glioblastoma brain tumor drugs like Gleostine available on the market today. Among this class of drug products, Gleostine is priced within the mid- to low-end range compared to other treatments,” the release said.
However, many people are still extremely distraught at the alleged price gouging.
“It was like they purchased Aspirin, put a pretty label on it, called it ‘Crapsin’ and charged people tons more money,” Gamer-Fanning said.
Related Content: