© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and CURE - Oncology & Cancer News for Patients & Caregivers. All rights reserved.
Ashley Chan, assistant editor for CURE®, has been with MJH Life Sciences since June 2023. She graduated with a B.A. in Communication Studies from Rowan University. Outside of work, Ashley enjoys spending time with family and friends, reading new novels by Asian American authors, and working on the manuscript of her New Adult novel.
Here are answers to 10 questions patients asked at the CURE® Educated Patient® Metastatic Breast Cancer Summit about scans, treatment and clinical trials.
Receiving a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer or knowing someone who has can be overwhelming, especially when there’s a lot to learn. So, during the CURE® Educated Patient Metastatic Breast Cancer Summit, two experts answered frequently asked questions about metastatic breast cancer.
From questions about scans, treatment advances to clinical trials, Dr. Jennifer M. Matro and Dr. Rebecca A. Shatsky, medical oncologists at the University of California San Diego Health, provided responses to patients at the summit.
Here are 10 answers to frequently asked questions about metastatic breast cancer.
Matro and Shatsky: Currently, Signatera is not used in monitoring metastatic breast cancer. We use scans and labs/tumor markets to monitor. This is an area of research, though.
Bone scans are done in combination with CT scans (imaging procedure to take detailed, two-dimensional pictures of the entire body) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. It typically would be done approximately every three months or even more frequently if needed for suspected disease progression (worsening or spreading) or aggressive disease.
There is no data whatsoever that suggests that frequent CT scans have any negative effects on patients with active metastatic breast cancer. CT scans are very necessary for disease monitoring and the benefits of monitoring metastatic breast cancer far outweigh any theoretical risks of radiation from CT scans.
Scans are not used in stage 1 to 3 breast cancer for almost any patient. Insurance does not pay for them, as they have not been shown to improve outcomes.
Data from the phase 3 postMONARCH trial, presented at ASCO this year, suggested that changing the hormone therapy and changing the CDK inhibitor to Verzenio (abemaciclib) provides greater benefit than a new hormone therapy on its own. So, in the absence of other mutations, this may be an option for some patients.
Yes, there are emerging data that Enhertu is very beneficial in leptomeningeal disease and brain metastases.
The development of leptomeningeal disease and the risk of brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease depends on the specific subtype of breast cancer patients have. The highest risk or rates are for HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. Brain metastases are rarer in estrogen-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, but the rates are increasing as patients live longer. The rates of leptomeningeal disease are higher also in patients with lobular breast cancer. There is no data that suggests that routine brain MRIs in asymptomatic patients improve outcomes.
READ MORE: Oncologist Debunks Clinical Trial Myths
This happens approximately 10% to 15% of the time, where the cancer recurs (comes back) in a different form than the initial presentation. That's why we always do a biopsy and receptor testing on newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer.
LEARN MORE: Biomarker Testing Is Essential in HR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
A patient must travel to wherever the trial they want to enroll in is being run. If they are in the state where the trial is being run and they want to hear more about it, they may be able to ask for a telemedicine visit to hear more about it. But to enroll, they will need to go there physically. If they want to get an opinion from a clinical trialist and don't live nearby, it's a great idea to ask for a telemedicine visit with a specific doctor at a big center that runs clinical trials.
Unfortunately, doctors are not able to prescribe therapies that are not FDA-approved through compassionate use, unless the respective drug company allows doctors to, which is incredibly rare.
I only prescribe "off-label therapy" when there is a good clinical rationale for using that therapy and a good chance it might work based on pre-clinical data (this is for drugs that are already FDA-approved in other cancer types. We cannot do this with drugs that are not yet approved).
It would be against the oncology code of ethics to prescribe a therapy that does not have good data for its use and that may benefit the patient.
For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.
Related Content: