Ulrike Boehmer, PhD

Lifestyle behaviors are thought to cause 42% of cancers (1) and evidence that SGM populations have higher rates of these known cancer risk factors is compelling. Compared to heterosexuals and after controlling for demographic characteristics, sexual minorities have higher odds of alcohol use disorder (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.83; 95% CI 1.65-2.03)(2) and higher tobacco use (aOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.27-2.56), (3) but at age 18, sexual minorities had three times the odds of using tobacco compared to heterosexuals of the same age.(2) Similarly, transgender individuals have higher tobacco use (aOR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0) compared to cisgender individuals (4) and meta-analyses show that 47.5% of transwomen use alcohol and 39.6% of transmen. (5) Compared to heterosexual women, lesbian women have higher odds of obesity (aOR 1.50; 95% CI 1.22-1.84) (6) and the trajectory towards obesity occurs at an early age for lesbian women (aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.10-3.32) compared to similarly aged heterosexual women. (7)

After lifestyle behaviors, the third most common cause of cancer, 15.4% of all cancers worldwide,(8) are infections, including &#8203;human papillomaviruses (HPV), Hepatitis B and C, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)&#8203;, which are linked to cervical cancer, anal cancer, and AIDS-related cancers,e.g., K&#8203;aposi'ssarcomaandnon-Hodgkin'slymphoma&#8203;. SGM populations are overrepresented with respect to having these infections. (9) The high prevalence of HIV among sexual minority men (defined as men who have sex with men (MSM) is well established, in that annually 68% of the new HIV infections occur in MSM and they make up 57% of all HIV diagnoses in the US. (10) HIV is also prevalent among transgender individuals, in that 19% of transwomen are HIV positive and these rates are even higher in racial minorities (44% in black and 26% in Hispanic transwomen).(5) Bisexual women have greater odds of high risk HPV infection (aOR 2.01; 95% CI 1.47-2.75) compared to heterosexual women. (11) HPV is known to be highly prevalent in MSM, 37.2% among HIV negative, but even higher (73.5%) in HIV positive MSM. &#8203;(10) A recent cohort study of young (between 22 and 25 years old) sexual minority men and transgender individuals who reported sex with men, showed high HPV rates among HIV negative (59%) and higher rates (88%) among HIV positive individuals. Particularly noteworthy is that HPV vaccinations were approved and recommended for this young aged cohort and nevertheless 45% had received zero doses of HPV vaccination.(12)

These elevated cancer risk factors are further compounded by SGM individuals’ low cancer screening rates. Analyses of representative US population data have shown lower screening rates for cervical cancer (Pap test in the last three years) in sexual minority (SM) women compared to heterosexual women after controlling for demographic characteristics; bisexual women’s adjusted odds ratio (aOR 0.66; 95%CI 0.47-0.93) lesbian women’s (aOR 0.57; 95%CI 0.36-0.89), women with exclusively female partners (aOR 0.10; 95%CI 0.03-0.27) compared to women with exclusively male partners. (13) These findings were echoed by a later study, which showed lesbian women’s adjusted odds ratio of cervical cancer screening (aOR 0.53; 95%CI 0.29-0.95) and in addition bisexual women’s breast cancer screening were significantly lower than heterosexual women’s (aOR 0.60; 95%CI 0.38-0.93). (14) Others have shown that compared to heterosexual individuals, SM individuals eligibility for lung cancer (LDCT) screening is significantly higher for gay men (aOR 3.58, 95%CI 1.25-10.30; ref heterosexual men) and lesbian women (aOR 4.95; 95%CI 1.82-13.4; reference group heterosexual women). (15) However, despite SM people’s significantly higher eligibility, they have CT scans at the same rate as heterosexuals. (15)

The Center of Excellence for Transgender Health at UCSF recommends gender minority (transgender) individuals should undergo cancer screening according to their anatomy. Aside from this the leading organizations that issue guidelines, e.g., American Cancer Society, lack explicit documentation on screening of transgender individuals. The US Preventive Services Taskforce and many other organizations refer to “women,” or at best “individuals with a cervix” and acknowledges that there are no cervical cancer screening data on lesbian women and transgender individuals.

The most compelling population-based data (16) indicate that compared to cisgender women, transmen had lower odds of lifetime Pap tests (aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.97) and gender-nonconforming individuals had even lower odds (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08-0.49). Transwomen had lower odds to ever had mammography breast cancer screening (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15-0.72) compared to cisgender women. (16)

For gender minorities epidemiologic data on higher cancer incidence are available, showing that transgender individuals have significantly higher proportional incidence ratios for HPV-related cancers (PIR 3.2; 95%CI 2.4-4.0), AIDS-defining cancers (PIR 2.6; 95%CI 2.1-3.1) and infection-related cancers (PIR 2.3; 95%CI 2.0-2.7) than cisgender men and higher than cisgender women HPV-related cancers (PIR 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.7), AIDS-defining cancers (PIR 2.3; 95% CI 1.9-2.8) and viral-related cancers (PIR 3.3; 95% CI 2.8-3.7).(17) Others reported on specific cancer sites, showing that compared to cisgender individuals transgender individuals have a higher incidence of Kaposi’s sarcoma (PIR 71.7; 95% CI 47.8-107.6) and anal cancer (PIR 29.7; 95% CI 22.4-39.4). (18) Surveillance data on SM populations’ cancer incidence, on the other hand, are missing and therefore the hypothesis that SM populations have higher cancer rates and present with later-stage cancer at diagnosis cannot be confirmed. However, in an effort to fill the surveillance gap on SM populations’ cancer incidence a number of ecological analyses have been performed, showing that geographic areas with more SM women have higher incidence of breast cancer, areas with more SM men have higher incidence of lung cancer and anal cancer, while areas with more SM men and women have higher incidence of colorectal cancer. (19-23) Cancer prevalence data are available from various population-based data sources and they show with consistency SGM populations have a higher cancer prevalence compared to heterosexual and cisgender people; the likelihood of a cancer diagnosis is significantly higher for gay men (aOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.5-2.5; reference heterosexual men)(24), for bisexual women (aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.16-2.48; reference heterosexual women)(25), for white SM women (aOR 1.40; 95%CI 1.07-1.82; reference white heterosexual women) (26, 27).

In this context, it is also important to address age differences, in that SGM populations are diagnosed with cancer at a younger age. Transgender individuals had a median age of 47.4 years at cancer diagnosis compared to cisgender individuals’ 66 years. (18) Gay men were on average 42 years old at diagnosis compared to heterosexual men who were 52 years old. (24) A later study of cancer survivors confirmed that SM cancer survivors are significantly younger by about 10 years; SM women were 52 years old compared to heterosexual women who were 62 years of age, while SM men were 58 compared to heterosexual men who were 66 years of age.(29) Research that focused on cancer survivors by sexual orientation points to SMG cancer survivors’ adverse condition, which include SM women survivors having greater access deficits (42.7% vs. 28.0%; reference heterosexual women survivors), (29) lesbian cancer survivors’ greater health care utilization (aOR 7.4; 95% CI 1.7-31.8; reference heterosexual women survivors) and bisexual men’s greater health care utilization (aOR 7.8; 95% CI 1.8-33.3; reference heterosexual men with cancer). (30) While the lack of surveillance data implies that cancer mortality data on SGM populations, these adverse situations among SGM cancer survivors may contribute towards explaining SGM populations’ greater cancer mortality, which has been established using diverse population-based data sources. Higher cancer mortality of SM populations has been shown by ecological studies (19-21) and by studying same-sex partnered women who had an age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer mortality (3.2; 95% CI 1.01-10.21) compared to different-sex partnered women. (31)

The strength of the evidence of SGM populations’ cancer-related disparities makes a compelling case for education of and interventions with health care providers to improve their delivery of cancer-related care to SGM populations. A review of nurse's and midwives’ knowledge and attitudes regarding SGM patients concluded that there is a lack of education regarding SGM populations’ health and a culture of heteronormativity that lead to inadequate care of SGM patients. (32) Considerable evidence points to physicians not being adequately prepared to care for SGM populations due to knowledge and attitudes. A recent (2016) national survey of oncology providers showed that 83% felt comfortable treating transgender patients, but 47 % self-reported lacking knowledge about SM populations’ health needs and 60% reported lacking knowledge about gender minorities’ health needs. (33) Surveys of other physician specialties confirm these problems; a 2016 survey of emergency room physicians reported 83% had no formal training about transgender individuals, while 88% reported treating them. (34)

A 2013 survey of obstetrics and gynecology providers, reported 66% had knowledge gaps related to the care of transgender patients, 35% reported feeling comfortable treating male-to-female patients, and 29% reported comfort treating female-to-male patients. (35) Noteworthy is that neither residency training in SGM patient care nor time in practice was related to OBGYN providers’ level of comfort treating these patients. (35) The persistence of knowledge gaps regarding the care of SGM populations going forward can be inferred from a survey of panel members of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN seeks to lead cancer care in the US by developing guidelines that address the cancer continuum from cancer prevention to treatment and cancer survivorship. &#8203;(36) Of the surveyed, NCCN panel members, 87% reported their current guidelines do not address SGM populations and reported they had no plans to change this in the future; moreover, 87% deemed sexual orientation not relevant for their cancer care guidelines and 90% deemed gender identity not relevant for the purpose of establishing guidelines. (36)

There are additional concerns that hinder &#8203;adequate care of SGM populations. A proportion of health care providers may treat SGM populations without being aware of it because they do not ask about sexual orientation or gender identity; estimates indicate 80% of providers believe asking about sexual orientation would offend their patients. (37) Without being prompted, SGM patients do not necessarily self-disclose their SGM identity to providers, fears of poor treatment by the provider are among the reasons for not disclosing. (38-40) There is consistent evidence that disclosure is linked to positive direct and indirect &#8203;health outcomes. (41) &#8203;Direct implications in cancer-related care have been shown, in that the low rates of cervical cancer screening have been linked to providers’ heterosexism, not recommending cervical cancer screening to SM women, poor quality of communication between providers and SM patients, and to nondisclosure of sexual orientation. (42, 43) Similarly, a study of sexual minority men showed 64% had disclosed their same-sex behavior/sexual orientation to their physicians and disclosing sexual minority men had a higher likelihood &#8203;(aPR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3) &#8203;of receiving guideline-recommended medical care, including HPV, Hepatitis A and B vaccinations. (9)

1. Islami F, Goding Sauer A, Miller KD, Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Jacobs EJ, McCullough ML, Patel AV, Ma J, Soerjomataram I, Flanders WD, Brawley OW, Gapstur SM, Jemal A. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):31-54.

2. Rice CE, Vasilenko SA, Fish JN, Lanza ST. Sexual minority health disparities: an examination of age-related trends across adulthood in a national cross-sectional sample. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;31:20-25. 3. Boyd CJ, Veliz PT, Stephenson R, Hughes TL, McCabe SE. Severity of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use Disorders Among Sexual Minority Individuals and Their "Not Sure" Counterparts. LGBT health. 2019;6(1):15-22. PMCID: 6352513.

4. Buchting FO, Emory KT, Scout, Kim Y, Fagan P, Vera LE, Emery S. Transgender Use of Cigarettes, Cigars, and E-Cigarettes in a National Study. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(1):e1-e7. PMCID: 5478444.

5. Becasen JS, Denard CL, Mullins MM, Higa DH, Sipe TA. Estimating the Prevalence of HIV and Sexual Behaviors Among the US Transgender Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2006-2017. Am J Public Health. 2018:e1-e8.

6. Caceres BA, Makarem N, Hickey KT, Hughes TL. Cardiovascular Disease Disparities in Sexual Minority Adults: An Examination of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2014-2016). American journal of health promotion : AJHP. 2019;33(4):576-585. PMCID: 6476632.

7. Wood SM, Schott W, Marshal MP, Akers AY. Disparities in Body Mass Index Trajectories From Adolescence to Early Adulthood for Sexual Minority Women. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2017;61(6):722-728. PMCID: 5701844.

8. Plummer M, de Martel C, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Franceschi S. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis. The Lancet Global health. 2016;4(9):e609-616.

9. Singh V, Crosby RA, Gratzer B, Gorbach PM, Markowitz LE, Meites E. Disclosure of Sexual Behavior Is Significantly Associated With Receiving a Panel of Health Care Services Recommended for Men Who Have Sex With Men. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;45(12):803-807.

10. CDC Factsheet HIV among Gay and Bisexual Men2019: Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/cdc-msm-508.pdf&#8203;.

11. Reiter PL, McRee AL. HPV infection among a population-based sample of sexual minority women from USA. Sex Trans Inf. 2017;93(1):25-31. PMCID: 5664198.

12. Halkitis PN, Valera P, LoSchiavo CE, Goldstone SE, Kanztanou M, Maiolatesi AJ, Ompad DC, Greene RE, Kapadia F. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Infection in Young Sexual Minority Men: The P18 Cohort Study. Aids Patient Care STDS. 2019;33(4):149-156. PMCID: 6459271.

13. Agenor M, Muzny CA, Schick V, Austin EL, Potter J. Sexual orientation and sexual health services utilization among women in the United States. Preventive medicine. 2017;95:74-81. PMCID: 5555111. 14. Charkhchi P, Schabath MB, Carlos RC. Modifiers of Cancer Screening Prevention Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2019;16(4 Pt B):607-620.

15. Veliz P, Matthews AK, Arslanian-Engoren C, Evans-Polce RJ, Lee JGL, Boyd CJ, Hughes T, McCabe VV, McCabe SE. LDCT lung cancer screening eligibility and use of CT scans for lung cancer among sexual minorities. Cancer epidemiology. 2019;60:51-54.

16. Tabaac AR, Sutter ME, Wall CSJ, Baker KE. Gender Identity Disparities in Cancer Screening Behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(3):385-393.

17. Nash R, Ward KC, Jemal A, Sandberg DE, Tangpricha V, Goodman M. Frequency and distribution of primary site among gender minority cancer patients: An analysis of U.S. national surveillance data. Cancer Epidemiology. 2018;54:1-6.

18. Hutchison LM, Boscoe FP, Feingold BJ. Cancers Disproportionately Affecting the New York State Transgender Population, 1979-2016. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(9):1260-1262. PMCID: 6085041.

19. Boehmer U, Miao X, Ozonoff A. Breast cancer mortality’s association with sexual orientation. Sexuality Research & Social Policy. 2013;10(4):279-284.

20. Boehmer U, Ozonoff A, Miao X. An ecological analysis of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: Differences by sexual orientation. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):400. PMCID: PMC3188512.

21. Boehmer U, Ozonoff A, Miao X. An ecological approach to examine lung cancer disparities due to sexual orientation. Public Health. 2012;126(7):605-612.

22. Boehmer U, Ozonoff A, Timm A. County-level association of sexual minority density with breast cancer incidence: results from an ecological study. Sex Res Social Policy. 2011;8(2):139-145.

23. Cress RD, Holly EA. Incidence of anal cancer in California: increased incidence among men in San Francisco, 1973-1999. Prev Med. 2003;36(5):555-560.

24. Boehmer U, Miao X, Ozonoff A. Cancer survivorship and sexual orientation. Cancer. 2011;107(16):3796-3804.

25. Gonzales G, Zinone R. Cancer diagnoses among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: results from the 2013-2016 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer causes & control : CCC. 2018;29(9):845-854. 26. Trinh MH, Agenor M, Austin SB, Jackson CL. Health and healthcare disparities among U.S. women and men at the intersection of sexual orientation and race/ethnicity: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMC public health. 2017;17(1):964. PMCID: 5735619.

27. Valanis BG, Bowen DJ, Bassford T, Whitlock E, Charney P, Carter RA. Sexual orientation and health: Comparisons in the women's health initiative sample. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(9, September/October):843-853.

29. Boehmer U, Gereige J, Winter M, Ozonoff A. Cancer Survivors’ Access to Care and Quality of Life: Do Sexual Minorities Fare Worse Than Heterosexuals? Cancer. 2019.

30. Boehmer U, Miao X, Ozonoff A. Health behaviors of cancer survivors of different sexual orientations. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(9):1489-1496.

31. Cochran SD, Mays VM. Risk of Breast Cancer Mortality Among Women Cohabiting with Same Sex Partners: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2003. J Women's Health. 2012;21(5):528-533.

32. Stewart K, O'Reilly P. Exploring the attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of nurses and midwives of the healthcare needs of the LGBTQ population: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;53:67-77. 33. Schabath MB, Blackburn CA, Sutter ME, Kanetsky PA, Vadaparampil ST, Simmons VN, Sanchez JA, Sutton SK, Quinn GP. National Survey of Oncologists at National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors About LGBTQ Patients With Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019:JCO1800551.

34. Chisolm-Straker M, Willging C, Daul AD, McNamara S, Sante SC, Shattuck DG, 2nd, Crandall CS. Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Patients in the Emergency Department: What Physicians Know, Think, and Do. Ann Emergency Med. 2018;71(2):183-188 e181.

35. Unger CA. Care of the transgender patient: a survey of gynecologists' current knowledge and practice. J Women's Health. 2015;24(2):114-118.

36. Hudson J, Schabath MB, Sanchez J, Sutton S, Simmons VN, Vadaparampil ST, Kanetsky PA, Quinn GP. Sexual and Gender Minority Issues Across NCCN Guidelines: Results From a National Survey. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2017;15(11):1379-1382. PMCID: 5705047.

37. Maragh-Bass AC, Torain M, Adler R, Schneider E, Ranjit A, Kodadek LM, Shields R, German D, Snyder C, Peterson S, Schuur J, Lau B, Haider AH. Risks, Benefits, and Importance of Collecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Healthcare Settings: A Multi-Method Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives. LGBT health. 2017;4(2):141-152.

38. Boehmer U, Case P. Physicians don't ask, sometimes patients tell: disclosure of sexual orientation among women with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1882-1889.

9. Durso LE, Meyer IH. Patterns and Predictors of Disclosure of Sexual Orientation to Healthcare Providers Among Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals. Sex Res Social Policy. 2013;10(1):35-42.

40. Brooks H, Llewellyn CD, Nadarzynski T, Pelloso FC, De Souza Guilherme F, Pollard A, Jones CJ. Sexual orientation disclosure in health care: a systematic review. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2018;68(668):e187-e196. PMCID: 5819984. 41. Ruben MA, Fullerton M. Proportion of patients who disclose their sexual orientation to healthcare providers and its relationship to patient outcomes: A meta-analysis and review. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(9):1549-1560.

42. Greene MZ, Meghani SH, Sommers MS, Hughes TL. Health Care-Related Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening among Sexual Minority Women: An Integrative Review. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2018. PMCID: 6433555.

43. Tabaac AR, Benotsch EG, Barnes AJ. Mediation Models of Perceived Medical Heterosexism, Provider-Patient Relationship Quality, and Cervical Cancer Screening in a Community Sample of Sexual Minority Women and Gender Nonbinary Adults. LGBT health. 2019;6(2):77-86.

Articles

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations face elevated cancer risk due to higher prevalence of lifestyle-related risk factors, infections, and lower cancer screening rates. SGM individuals, including sexual minorities and transgender individuals, exhibit higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use, obesity, and infections like HIV and HPV, contributing to increased cancer incidence. Despite higher eligibility for screenings, SGM populations often receive inadequate cancer-related care due to healthcare providers' knowledge gaps and heteronormative biases. Addressing these disparities requires targeted education and interventions to improve healthcare delivery for SGM populations.

Sexual and gender minorities are not receiving the same standard of clinical care as other patients with cancer.

Ulrike Boehmer, PhD

Cancer Related Clinical Care of Sexual and Fender Minorities

Latest News